ࡱ> Y[X@ 2#jbjb &Pdd;ldddd8ddS8PPfffEEE8888888,: !<d>8EAEEE>8ffPEff86.6E8g 4D64,ddP5$6|S8S8t5 <<6Write in the gray sections only. Write over the existing text in the gray sections. As a style guide, see Bay Scorecard Technical Appendices (bottom of page at http://www.bay.org/ecological_scorecard.htm). Indicator leads: write text for your indicators in two documents, ONE FOR EACH WATERSHED. All writers: Send a .doc for each watershed to scorecard@sonomacreek.net with your initials in the filename. 8/28/2008 Writing assignments: Other sectionsIndicator (section 3.1 in blue below)Index (section 3 in red below)AlexRunoff coefficient, surface storageBobDry season flow, groundwater, importsStorageCaitlin2, 7Deanne1.5Recharge protectionKatImpervious areLisa1.3, 2supplyPeter1.4, 2 lead, 6Consumption, residential water use, demand on groundwaterRainer1.4, 2stewardship Watershed Health Scorecard Technical Report Version date: ___________ Introduction [8 or less pages] Purpose of the Watershed Health Scorecard context, need, purpose. Key questions the indicators and indices address. This first issue of the Watershed Health Scorecard should answer the question: how is this watershed doing in terms of the availability of water to meet local ecosystem and human needs indefinitely? This project was inspired by The Bay Institutes Bay Scorecard ( http://www.bay.org/ecological_scorecard.htm.) Intended audiences potential users of the scorecard. Three products will be produced for each watershed, each for a different audience. Scope and limits of the Scorecard (e.g Appropriate topics for watershed scorecards are those that are of concern to many stakeholders and decision-makers, that have sufficient available data, and that need to be simplified so that informed decisions regarding watershed management can be made.) Comparison with other ecological health indicator efforts (including, possibly: the San Francisco Bay Index (www.bay.org/ecological_scorecard.htm), the Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative Indicators Workgroup (www.valleywater.org/_wmi/index.shtm), the Sacramento River Watershed Program (www.sacriver.org), the Great Valley Center (www.greatvalley.org/indicators/index.aspx), and the Silicon Valley Environmental Index (www.svep.org)). Online resources Where to find the data and products online. Methodology [(4 6 pages, including model diagram)] Conceptual framework how the team approached the development of the Scorecard: using the conceptual model of water stocks and flows to ensure nothing was overlooked choosing indices: Approach considered: surface water and groundwater. Approach considered: supply sufficiency and sponginess Approach taken: supply sufficiency and storage. Screening potential indicators Describe in general how indicators were filtered. What criteria were used? Screening potential data doing data searches to determine if (1) data were available that could serve as appropriate metrics; (2) data were in a form readily useable without much additional work (e.g., the raw NRCS database on soils would have to be re-worked and was therefore unsuitable). Paths not taken Which of the boxes and arrows in the conceptual model couldnt be parameterized due to lack of information? What can we say about candidate indicators that we thought would make terrific additions to the Scorecard, but for which the data gaps are too significant for now? What might the consequences be of NOT having the ideal indicator(s)? (all we can do is monitor the decline of the system rather than using appropriate indicators to select appropriate management interventions and find out if they result in the desired outcomes.) Why were some indicators unscored? A variety of reasons: no good data, no time to analyze data or determine how to analyze it, data too costly to be collected in future, or not clear how to assign score to data. Team agreed that these indicators are important enough to be mentioned throughout scorecard reports to draw attention to gaps in knowledge. Index: Water Supply Score: ______ Trend: __________ Paragraph: background and description of this resource/element, history of change for this index topic, maps and figures, definitions of key words, limits of what the index reveals and does not reveal, other efforts to measure status and trends of this index topic Index: Water Supply, Indicator: [title] [3 10 pages/indicator] Introduction What message are we trying to convey with this indicator? Why was this indicator chosen over other options? What other indicators were considered, and why were they rejected? In an ideal world, what indicator would be best for conveying the message, and why was it used or not used? Data availability What datasets were considered, and why was this one chosen? Who collects this particular dataset and how? References or links to the dataset and protocol. Caveats about the dataset. How likely is it that the dataset will be available in the future? Analysis, methodology, calculations what metric was chosen, how was it calculated and why? Why were other methods rejected? What time period did the data come from that was used for the calculation? In an ideal world, what metric would be best for conveying the message, and why was it used or not used? Evaluation and scoring How was the metric scored, and why? Justify the scoring breakpoints. Include graphs that convey something meaningful about the results. Describe short term and long term trends and explanations for these trends. Cite other statistics that support or round out the results. Discussion What does this indicator and its result tell us about the health of the watershed, for the ability of the watershed to sustainably provide ecosystem services to human and non-human members of this watershed community? What does it NOT tell us? Caveats about the result? Data Gaps and Recommendations recommendations for future reporting on this indicator, both in the real world and in the ideal world? Index: Water Supply, Indicator: [title] You get the idea Repeat format as above in 3.1. Index: Water Supply, Indicator: [title] Index: Water Storage Score: ______ Trend: __________ Paragraph: background and description of this resource/element, history of change for this index topic, maps and figures, definitions of key words, limits of what the index reveals and does not reveal, other efforts to measure status and trends of this index topic Index: Water Storage, Indicator: [title] You get the idea Repeat format as above in 3.1. Index: Water Stewardship Score: ______ Trend: __________ Paragraph: background and description of this resource/element, history of change for this index topic, maps and figures, definitions of key words, limits of what the index reveals and does not reveal, other efforts to measure status and trends of this index topic Index: Water Stewardship, Indicator: [title] You get the idea Repeat format as above in 3.1. Summary and recommendations for future watershed scorecard efforts [2-3 pages] Not just about content and technical lessons learned, but also about this Scorecard teams experience of the projects process, and recommendations for future Scorecard editions in these watersheds or Scorecard projects in other watersheds [pull text from annual report] Funders and acknowledgements [under 3 pages] Authorship Funders Acknowledgments Watershed Health Scorecard: Technical Report  PAGE 1 T+6 8 e  f N O e  C X Y   BX "ннАнннаŰ *CJOJQJ *>*CJOJQJ *>*B*CJOJQJph *B*CJOJQJph *CJOJQJB*CJOJQJph CJOJQJCJ$5B*OJQJph5B*OJQJph 5OJQJOJQJ5CJ8*+  $If ! !&dP^^ *+  789=>dlmuz{|}ýztnhc^X                                                           >   d s   t!  789=>dlnhhhhnhh]h $If !$If$$Ifl\y {$064 la lmuz{|}n@hhhhnhhhhnXh$If$$Ifl\y {$064 la hThD] $If !$$Ifl\y {$064 la$If    ! ( ) 5 6 7 8 T e    P Q ļ~{rolifc`]tu=>                      M  \   b c   j   k   r   w x   y   "   ! ( ) 5 6 cp]]]]c$If$$Ifl\y {$064 la $If ! 6 7 8 T e    P Q 1$7$8$H$ # ` P@ & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@ & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@^ &dPQ d e   A B   ABWX  #$/0}zwtheb_%01J   K   rjk  H  Iuv   M   yNUVx   y   / Q d e   A B   AB1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@ & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@h^h1$7$8$H$ # ` P@ & FBWX  #$/0@AYZh^h1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@ & F"#$-/0?@AZ}Mg|tvw4<KRh !?!@!!"""$#%#j0JCJOJQJU CJOJQJ *B*CJOJQJphB*CJOJQJph *B*CJOJQJph *B*OJQJph *CJOJQJ *B*CJOJQJphB*CJOJQJph CJOJQJ80@AYZ>?LMhi{|vwurol`]Ztu   )   T        W  Xab  $   ">?LMhi{|vw^ & Fh^h & F & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@wx34=>g & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@h^h & F & Fwx34=>gh !!@!A!!!""ûwtqnfc`]  EFs  t}~     !BCX  Y      DEFd   e$gh !!@!A!!!"""" & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@ & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@""""""""""/#1#2#p   qy   z     """"""""/#0#1#2# !$1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@ h1$7$8$H$^h & 0` P@ & F1$7$8$H$ & 0` P@ %#+#,#-#.#/#1#2# CJOJQJ CJOJQJ0JCJOJQJmHj0JCJOJQJU0JCJOJQJ$1h/ =!"#$% i8@8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH @@@ Heading 1$h@&^h 5OJQJ<< Heading 2$@&5CJOJQJ<A@< Default Paragraph Font,@,Header  !, @,Footer  !&)@& Page Number<B@"< Body TextB*CJOJQJph2 P!z z z z zP/ 2:::="%#2#' l6 Q Bg"2#!"$&Q 0"2# #%.57=!8@0(  B S  ?2)8==V  99mm}}667788RTdd$="$.//03)8==V  99mm}}7788RTdd$="$.//03Caitlin Cornwall_Hard Drive:Documents:SonomaEcologyCenter:Research:scorecard:Technical Report:20080827report.docCaitlin CornwallHHard Drive:Users:user:Documents:Microsoft User Data:Word Work File A_102Caitlin CornwallHHard Drive:Users:user:Documents:Microsoft User Data:Word Work File A_102Caitlin CornwallHHard Drive:Users:user:Documents:Microsoft User Data:Word Work File A_102Caitlin CornwallHHard Drive:Users:user:Documents:Microsoft User Data:Word Work File A_102Caitlin CornwallHHard Drive:Users:user:Documents:Microsoft User Data:Word Work File A_102Caitlin CornwallHHard Drive:Users:user:Documents:Microsoft User Data:Word Work File A_102Caitlin Cornwall_Hard Drive:Documents:SonomaEcologyCenter:Research:scorecard:Technical Report:20080827report.docCaitlin Cornwall_Hard Drive:Documents:SonomaEcologyCenter:Research:scorecard:Technical Report:20080827report.docCaitlin Cornwall_Hard Drive:Documents:SonomaEcologyCenter:Research:scorecard:Technical Report:20080827report.doc[; r;cLr;Trdx18}P85r;`>>aO;BOHr;;Hv{gPZ-=Tr;h!m[hH-v[o<*.Wisr;A|r;808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.   ^ `hH.   ^ `hH.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.9hh^h`56789;<B*CJH*OJQJS*TXo(ph.P8^`P56B*CJOJQJo(ph..^`56B*CJOJQJo(ph...xp^`x56B*CJOJQJo(ph.... @ ^`56B*CJOJQJo(ph .....  X ^ `Xo( ......  ^ `o(....... 8^`8o(........ `H^``o(.........808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo pp^p`hH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. ^`hH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PP^P`hH.h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.808^8`0o(.^`o(.pLp^p`Lo(.@ @ ^@ `o(.^`o(.L^`Lo(.^`o(.^`o(.PLP^P`Lo(.h!m[h!m[Tr85;HgPO;B`>v[oOHcL=TA|[; Wis1                                                                 789=>dlmuz{|}!()563@**4& **)R2 @GTimes New Roman5Symbol3 Arial7 VerdanaC MArialMTArial? Courier New;Wingdings"1h,fcɦL . !x0d 2QHX" Employee ofCaitlin Cornwall Oh+'0x  4 @ LX`hp'ss Employee ofWoEmpEmpNormaleCaitlin Cornwallrd8itMicrosoft Word 10.1@ @`fǞ@t ՜.+,0 hp  ' Napa RCDNa.   Title  !"#$%&'(*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGIJKLMNOQRSTUVWZRoot Entry Fƺq\1Table)<WordDocument&PSummaryInformation(HDocumentSummaryInformation8PCompObjX FMicrosoft Word DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8